OrbitalHub

Somewhere around 3.6 billion years ago, on what was probably an unremarkable afternoon, a sandstorm rolled into Gale crater on Mars. It may have lasted only hours. By the next day, the wind was back to normal and the surface was a sunlit desert again. No one saw it. Nothing else on the planet recorded it. But the storm left a physical imprint, and NASA's Curiosity rover drove past that imprint on December 12, 2024, on its 4,391st Martian day, and photographed it (NASA Science Photojournal, July 20 2026).

The imprint is now the cover paper of the July 1, 2026 issue of the journal Geology. A team led by Steven Banham of Imperial College London describes millimeter-thick, crinkly laminations inside a rock the rover team nicknamed "Jawbone Canyon," in the Mirador formation on the lower slopes of Mount Sharp. The structures are supercritical climbing wind ripple strata: a class of wind-deposited layering so rare on Earth that sedimentologists have only documented it in a handful of modern and ancient settings, and never before on another planet (Banham et al. 2026, Geology 54(7):611, DOI 10.1130/G54158.1).

Mars climate science has long had a sandstorm problem. Orbital cameras have shown that dust devils and regional dust storms lift fines off the surface today. Climate models assume that early Mars had a thicker atmosphere capable of moving sand. But the physical evidence for sustained sand-moving winds on ancient Mars has been almost entirely indirect: cross-bedded sandstones that record long-term wind patterns, dune fields that froze into rock, ventifacts worn by saltation.

Those records cannot resolve a single weather event. A climbing wind ripple is the signature of a wind strong enough, lasting long enough, and carrying enough sand that the ripples could not migrate as fast as new sand arrived. The crests piled up on the stoss side instead of sliding down the lee side. Each millimeter-thick lamina is the trace of a burst of sand transport; the climb angle records how fast sediment accumulated relative to how fast the bedform moved. The team measured angles of 10 to 18 degrees, values the paper says can only be produced by storms lasting minutes to hours, not by seasonal winds over thousands of years.

That makes the Jawbone Canyon outcrop the first direct physical evidence of a sandstorm on Mars. The paper's wording is measured: "These climbing ripple sets occur in a thin succession, which suggests that they record a broader sustained event, such as a sandstorm or gale, lasting several hours or more." The phrase is doing real work, because the alternative explanations had to be ruled out one by one. The central argument is a negative: ordinary wind regimes cannot deposit climbing ripples of these thicknesses at these angles, so whatever made them had to be stronger than everyday wind.

A secondary argument reaches further. Banham notes in the paper and in press interviews that the modern Martian atmosphere, at roughly 6 millibars of mean surface pressure, is too thin to drive saltation at the scale required to build these structures (Astrobiology.com, April 4 2026). The deposits imply that the atmosphere three and a half billion years ago was denser than today's. The exact density is not pinned down, but the qualitative conclusion is clear: the air on early Mars was heavy enough to push sand in ways the present-day air cannot.

The find was not part of any planned observation. Curiosity's science team operates in shifts, and one of the standing tasks is to scan the black-and-white navigation panoramas taken at the end of each drive for anything anomalous. Banham and his collaborators, including Linda Kah of the University of Tennessee, Joel Davis of Imperial College London, Sanjeev Gupta, Gerhard Paar, and several JPL-Caltech sedimentologists and mission scientists, noticed unusual textures in those panoramas as the rover approached the Mirador formation. They targeted the rocks with the higher-resolution Mastcam, and at full resolution the laminations resolved into the climbing ripple patterns.

Banham described the find as serendipitous: "We weren't really looking for these deposits, and then lo and behold, we drove around the corner and found them. We were lucky that we had just the right people on shift that recognized them." The rock itself is modest in size, roughly a meter wide and 20 centimeters high, with six discrete packages of ripple layers stacked through its thickness. The laminae dip toward the north, which means the wind that built them came from the south. Similar climbing ripples were later identified at a nearby site the team named Dry Lake, and the paper argues that the deposits formed near the margin of a larger dune field or in a wind-scoured depression where airflow patterns concentrated sand accumulation.

The discovery is also a vindication of the Mastcam team's instinct to keep taking high-resolution follow-up imagery of "unusual" textures. Climbing ripples this small could have been mistaken for noise in lower-resolution data, or simply dismissed as weathered outcrop. The fact that a thin succession of six packages survived in one place for over three billion years, exposed at the surface for the rover to roll up to, is its own piece of good fortune.

The terminology is precise. In sedimentology, ripples are small bedforms, typically a few centimeters tall and tens of centimeters in wavelength, that form when wind or water flows over a bed of loose sand and organizes it into regular undulations. In a normal subcritical regime, sand grains saltate up the windward (stoss) face and avalanche down the leeward (lee) face, and the ripple migrates downwind without growing vertically. In a supercritical regime, the wind is strong enough and the sand supply is high enough that grains accumulate faster on the stoss face than they can slide off the lee face, so the ripple climbs. The climb angle is set by the ratio of vertical accumulation to horizontal migration; a 10-degree angle corresponds to roughly six times as much vertical deposition as horizontal migration.

Climbing ripples have been documented in a small number of terrestrial settings: deep-sea turbidity currents, certain wind-blown dune margins, and a few fluvial flood deposits. They are rare because the conditions that produce them are themselves unusual. On Mars, no one had ever identified them, in part because orbital images cannot resolve millimeter-scale laminae and in part because no previous rover had driven through sedimentary terrain with both the imaging resolution and the science team bandwidth to spot them.

The Banham paper lays out the diagnostic criteria: millimeter-scale lamina thickness, climb angles between 10 and 18 degrees, preserved stoss-side grainflow cross-stratification, and lateral continuity across the outcrop face. All four appear at Jawbone Canyon. The team estimates that a single 50-millimeter-thick layer could have formed in 6 to 20 minutes under storm conditions; the full succession of six packages therefore records on the order of an hour or two of sustained sand transport (Daily Galaxy, July 17 2026).

Curiosity has been on Mars for more than thirteen years. In that time it has found evidence of ancient lakes, rivers, groundwater, organic molecules, and a past climate that was at least intermittently habitable. What it had not found, until now, is direct evidence of an ancient sandstorm. The Jawbone Canyon outcrop fills that gap with a single rock roughly the size of a kitchen table.

The immediate payoff is a new constraint on early Mars atmospheric density: the air had to be thick enough to drive saltation at storm intensities. The longer-term payoff is a search template. Banham has said the next thing he wants the team to find is raindrop impact marks, craters in fine sediment left by rain, which would settle a separate debate about whether early Mars ever saw liquid rain rather than only snow and surface runoff. "It would be magic if we found those," he said. The climbing ripples are not the last stop on Curiosity's geology to-do list. They are evidence that the rover is still, after 4,391 sols, finding things on Mars that no one had asked it to look for.

Abstract

The blogpost explores relativistic effects on proof-of-work based cryptocurrency protocols. Cryptocurrencies are here to stay and it is quite plausible that future human colonists spread across the solar system and beyond will use a decentralized cryptocurrency as opposed to a fiat currency issued by a central authority. The low transaction fees, the ubiquitous access, not being bound by exchange rates or interest rates, not being controlled by financial institutions who are serving foreign interests -- these are some of the advantages cryptocurrencies will enjoy in the thriving exo-economy.

Motivation

At present, on a cryptocurrency network, the information exchanged by the nodes in the network reaches each node almost instantaneously. The speed at which the TCP/IP packets travel on the network and the fact that the Internet spans only the Earth and the LEO makes this possible. However, once the region the network is spread across will reach certain boundaries, the network size would have negative impact on the network: increasing communication failures due to network delays, more frequent and longer blockchain forks as part of the proof-of-work protocol, network segregation into local sub-networks (let us call them topological forks), just to name a few.

Nullius in verba... as they say. Let's go deeper into details and figure out a feasible solution for a truly interplanetary cryptocurrency.

Cryptocurrency 101

You can think of a cryptocurrency as a digital money ecosystem. Plain and simple. A collection of technologies are part of this ecosystem, all of them the result of years of research in the cryptography and distributed systems fields: a decentralized network of computers, a public transaction ledger -- also known as a blockchain, a protocol that consists of a set of rules for transaction validation, a decentralized consensus mechanism. [ANTO]

A decentralized network of computers ensures the resilience of the network. We can think of both computing power and data storage capabilities. As the computing power is distributed across the network, any disruption can be successfully handled by the network. Transaction data resides on all nodes of the network. This implies that even physical damage done to network nodes will not take out the network.

The blockchain is a public distributed ledger which stores all transactions handled by the network. As the name suggests, the blockchain is a list of data blocks. Each of these blocks contains a set of transactions, as many as can fit in the block, given the maximum size of the block (a characteristic of the network). Transactions contain sender and receiver info, and the amount/asset that is changing ownership, and they are broadcasted and added to blocks by network nodes. Blocks are linked to the previous block in the chain by a cryptographic hash (the hash of the previous block becomes part of the current block). This backward link leads all the way to the first block in the chain, the Genesis block. Each cryptocurrency blockchain has one. The cryptographic hashes have an important role in protecting the blockchain from tampering attempts.

The transaction validation rules enforced by the nodes in the network ensure that the content of each block in the blockchain is valid. By far, the most frequent form of fraud is double spending. The validation process makes sure that the inputs on the transactions exist and that they have not been already spent. The transactions marked as invalid are rejected by the network and do not make it on the blockchain.

The consensus mechanism is designed so that all the nodes in the network can agree on the set of transactions to be included in the current block. It shifts the authority and the credibility required by a central clearing house to a network of nodes. Important to mention here that, inherently, the nodes do not trust each other, and they do not have to because the trust is enforced by the consensus mechanism itself.

The Proof-of-Work

We mentioned above that one of the key innovations that make cryptocurrencies possible is the decentralized consensus mechanism. Currently, the de facto consensus mechanism is the proof-of-work.

The proof-of-work consensus mechanism was proposed by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008 [NAKA]. In general, a proof-of-work is a piece of data that requires costly and time consuming computational effort, but it is very easy to verify. A very good analogy is one of your semester projects in college... it takes you a whole semester to finalize it, but it takes very little time and effort for your supervisor to evaluate and grade it. Similarly, proof-of-work is used by cryptocurrencies for block generation. For the network to accept the block, nodes must complete a proof-of-work which also guarantees the integrity of the transactions included in the block. The difficulty of the proof-of-work is adjusted by the network so that a new block can be generated every fixed time interval. This fixed time interval is characteristic to every cryptocurrency. Most notably, for Bitcoin this time interval is set to 10 minutes.

Satoshi Nakamoto's solution, emobodied by the proof-of-work algorithm above, achieves consensus on the network without a central trusted authority (hence the name decentralized consensus mechanism).

Enter the Ansible

For the astute reader, it is quite obvious at this point that communication delays between the network nodes have a direct effect on the protocol described above. An important assumption made when the protocol was designed is that these delays are small, and this is why they can be handled by the network when the nodes choose to follow and validate the blocks on the longest blockchain fork. Also, this is the reason why all the nodes in the network can have a say in the network consensus. They all can find a solution for the current block, and they all can be rewarded when they find the solution. The communication delays witnessed by the peripheral nodes will cripple their ability to find solutions and these nodes will not be incentivized to remain in the network. Hence, the segregation of the network effect mentioned earlier.

Unfortunately, given the current technological level of our civilization, we do not have at our disposal a technology that allows us to communicate fast and reliable over the large expanse of space. It would take a hell of a wait time to proces a payment made by a mining corporation in the TRAPPIST-1 system, 12 parsecs within the constellation of Aquarius, to a planetary engineering corporation located in the Sol system... twice 39 years plus the block confirmation time.

Fortunately, the Sci-Fi literature already offers a solution for our problem. For those of you, Sci-Fi nerds like myself, that have already read Rocannon's World [LEGU] and Ender's Game [CARD], the Ansible device must sound very familiar. The ansible is a fictional device capable of faster-than-light communication. To word this differently, an operator of such device can send and receive messages to and from another device over any distance with no delay.

Hence, even if only in the realm of science fiction, we will be able to devise a solution for the problem that the future cryptocurrency enthusiasts, living in the outer space colonies, will eventually face.

The Special Relativity Theorem

Before elaborating more on a required upgrade of the network protocol, we have to discuss the special relativity theorem and its implications on how time and distance are perceived in reference systems.

Albert Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921. He received it for his contributions to the understanding of the photoelectric effect, after publishing a paper on it in 1905. At that point his contributions to the understanding of gravity through his theory of relativity were well known, but the new perspective on gravity offered by Einstein's theory was so controversial that the Nobel Prize Committee members chose to protect their reputation. They decided that it was appropriate to award Einstein the Nobel Prize for "his services to theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect."

During his research Einstein attempted to reconcile the principle of relativity with the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light. This attempt led Einstein to the discovery of the special relativity theorem. Einstein's Gedankenexperiment (thought experiment) with a test subject travelling by train is very well known in the scientific community. If our human subject is walking towards the front of the train with velocity w with respect to the train, and the train is moving with velocity v with respect to the embankment, then an observer on the embankment will measure as W = v + w the velocity of our subject on the train. If instead of our traveller, we consider a beam of light propagating with velocity c, the velocity measured by the observer on the embarkment would be v + c. However, this violates the principle that the velocity of light is constant in any inertial reference system and equal with c. Einstein found a solution for this problem and thus resolved the incompatibility.

One direct consequence of the special relativity theorem is the Lorentz transformation.

Before the relativity theorem, time in physics had an absolute significance, independent of the state of motion of the reference system. However, every inertial reference system has its own particular time. We always have to be told which inertial reference system the statement of time refers to. If you look at your watch, the time you read is the time as measured in the Earth inertial reference system. By the way, the Earth circles the Sun on an almost circular orbit, which means that any body maintaining a constant position in the Earth reference system should experience some centripetal force. However, this centripetal component is negligible compared to the gravitational pull of the Earth. Hence, engineers use this aproximation when calculating satellite orbits.

Back to our original trail of thoughts... the axiom that lays the foundation for the Lorentz transformation states that every ray of light possesses the velocity of transmission c relative to any inertial reference system. That is the velocity of transmission in vacuo (in a vacuum).

If following Einstein's thought experiments [EINS], the above-mentioned axiom leads to a set of four equations that explain the relation between dimensional and temporal coordinates in two inertial reference systems:

  x' = (x - vt)/sqr(1 - v²/c²)
  y' = y
  z' = z
  t' = (t - x*v/c²)/sqr(1 - v²/c²)

where:

 x, y, z, t coordinates in inertial reference system K,
 x', y', z' , t' coordinates in inertial reference system K',
 v the relative velocity between inertial reference systems;

also, the expression 1//sqr(1 - v²/c²) is known as the Lorentz factor.

The Lorentz transformation equations are a more general case of the Galilean transformation:

  x' = x - vt
  y' = y
  z' = z
  t' = t

which is the basis of the assumptions of the classical mechanics as to the absolute character of both dimensional and temporal coordinates. The above are the result of replacing velocity c with ∞ in the Lorentz transformation equations.

The Lorentz transformation has a few corollaries which have an impact on time dilation, length contraction, relativistic mass, relativistic momentum, and relativistic kinetic energy. The one that concerns us is the time dilation corollary:

 Δt = γΔt'
 
where γ is defined by

 α = 1/γ = sqr(1 - v²/c²)

Assuming a clock at rest in inertial reference system K, and moving with the velocity v in the inertial reference system K', the time Δt' between two ticks as measured in the frame K' is longer than the time Δt between the same ticks as measured in the rest frame of the clock, K.

Relativistic Effects on Proof-of-Work

To better understand the relativistic effects on how relative time is perceived in two inertial reference systems (or Galilean reference systems [EINS]) we have to mention the twin paradox. The twin paradox is a thought experiment that involves two identical twins. One of the twins makes a journey into space onboard a relativistic spaceship, and upon his return to Earth discovers that his twin has aged much more than he did. Depending on how fast the spaceship moves through space and/or how long the journey was, our traveller could return to Earth and realize that several generations have passed meanwhile.

As a direct application of the twin paradox, we have Mazer Rackham, International Fleet Admiral and Ender Wiggin's mentor, as portrayed by Orson Scott Card [CARD]. The fighter pilot who destroyed the Formic Fleet Flagship, killed the Hive Queen, and ended the Second Formic Invasion, Mazer Rackham is sent on a journey on a relativistic spaceship and returns to Earth 100 years later in order to assist the International Fleet. Upon his return he has barely aged a few years.

Similarly, if a subnetwork is moving relative to the rest of the network, the nodes in the subnetwork would experience time dilation as predicted by the special relativity theorem. Hence, they are at a disadvantage compared to the rest of the nodes because they have less time available to find a solution for the proof-of-work problem. In order to make thing square for all the nodes in the network, the difficulty of the problem should be adjusted in each subnetwork using the Lorentz factor: in order to compensate for time dilation, the relativistic nodes should have to solve a simpler problem. Also, their block confirmation time should decrease as well.

One element is missing still... how do ansibles synchronize? What value has the Lorentz factor for each one of them? One simple solution for this problem is having one of the ansibles (let us say the Earth-bound one) broadcasting a beacon every fixed number of seconds. The ansibles interfacing to subnetworks would pick up the broadcast, and by measuring the time interval between the beacons, infer the Lorentz factor. Once the Lorentz factor is determined, the nodes mining on the subnetworks will have their proof-of-work difficulty and the block confirmation time adjusted accordingly.

A more Down-to-Earth Solution for the Problem

We will fork the storyline (pun intended) at Enter the Ansible paragraph, and suggest a more down-to-earth solution for the problem. The peripheral nodes are not to participate in the consensus. Their function would be just to relay messages (a.k.a. payment information) across the network. In our multi-planetary scenario, the nodes working on the proof-of-work would reside on/around the Earth, and the network nodes on Mars or any other region in the Sol system would have to wait 2x (network packets travel time) + (block confirmation time) in order to confirm a payment. However, such a solution would have an Achilles heel very hard to defend... if starting its mining engine, any peripheral node could take over the local network and force a topological fork of the network. For a node, the incentive of staying honest on the current network must be stronger than any reward obtained by cheating.

Concluding remarks

While the blogpost contains some elements of fiction, it accurately describes the cryptocurrency ecosystem, the special relativity theorem, the Lorentz transformation and its corollaries. We would like to thank the readers that went through this exercise with us. Undeniably, cryptocurrencies are disrupting the global economy and they are here to stay. Undeniably, we -- as a species -- will explore and migrate farther than the LEO. History has taught us that decentralization is the key to survival and prosperity. Let us together make the future happen.

References

[ANTO] Antonopoulos, Andreas M., Mastering Bitcoin, Second Edition, O'Reilly Media, Inc., June 2017;
[CARD] Card, Orson Scott, Ender's Game, A Tor Teen Book, 2014;
[EINS] Einstein, Albert, Relativity, The Special and the General Theory, Princeton University Press, 2015;
[LEGU] Le Guin, Ursula K., Rocannon's World, Harper & Row, 1977;
[NAKA] Nakamoto, Satoshi, Bitcoin - A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, www.bitcoin.org, 2008;